26 Jun 2026 - nzge
is understanding and the illusion of it one and the same?
how much of language truly encodes meaning?
if ai hallucinations can produce 50% accuracy in conveying true meaning, what is the distinction of ai between “true human thought”
the reality of the usefulness of thought is that it only has to be a certain percentage “correct” to be “useful”
what percentage of an info’s accuracy and precision the factor that skews understanding and perception? maybe it’s highly dependent on what domain. but sometimes the overarching concept is more important than the granular numbers and details